23/3/2026
7
Min
Bounce-Back Loan Disputes
The Bounce Back Loan scheme was designed for speed, offering a vital cash injection to businesses during the pandemic. It provided funds quickly but with little initial scrutiny. Now, lenders and government bodies are taking a closer look at the businesses that applied for these loans, the facts declared on their applications and how they used the funds. For some directors, this creates significant legal and financial risk. Here’s what you need to know.

How are bounce-back loan disputes triggered?
Although it has now been several years since businesses originally took out bounce-back loans, lenders and government bodies continue to retrospectively review applications and how funds were used. Directors who suspect there may have been irregularities in obtaining or using a BBL should be aware that they may still face investigation and, potentially, legal consequences.
Investigations and disputes are typically triggered by three main issues:
- Eligibility issues: Scrutiny reveals the company was not eligible at the time of application. This includes overstating turnover, applying when dormant, or taking out more than one BBL.
- Misuse of funds: The loan was not used for the "economic benefit of the business." This includes using funds for personal purchases, paying off personal debts, or transferring money to personal accounts without commercial justification.
- Default and dissolution: The company defaults on repayments, or is dissolved (struck off) without properly settling the BBL, prompting an investigation into the director's conduct.
What risks do I face as a director in a BBL dispute?
Although the original terms of the government’s Bounce Back Loan scheme did not require a personal guarantee, directors are not entirely immune from personal liability. If misconduct is found to have occurred, either during the application process, in how the funds were spent, or in how the company was dissolved or wound up, the consequences for individual directors can be severe:
You may be banned from serving as a company director
The Insolvency Service may seek a Director Disqualification Undertaking to settle the dispute, meaning you voluntarily disqualify yourself (sometimes in exchange for a shorter disqualification period), or you may be forcibly disqualified as a result of a court case. In either scenario, the maximum disqualification period is fifteen years.
You may be held personally liable for all or part of the debt
If you are found guilty of misfeasance, improper use of funds or other breaches of your duty as a company director, the court may issue a Personal Liability Order, which makes you personally responsible for paying off the bounce-back loan debt (or an agreed portion of the total debt).
You may be subject to criminal proceedings in some cases
Serious cases where a director is suspected of deliberate deception may be handled through criminal proceedings, principally under the Fraud Act 2006. In these cases, there is a risk of heavy fines and compensation orders, as well as significant prison sentences, if a director is found guilty.
BBL terminology: legal terms explained in plain English
|
Term |
What it means |
|---|---|
|
Creditor |
Any individual, company, or entity to whom your company owes money. In a bounce-back loan dispute, the primary creditor will usually be the bank that issued the BBL or, in some cases, the government if it has paid out to the bank under the BBL guarantee. |
|
Director Disqualification Undertaking |
A voluntary agreement where a director agrees that they will disqualify themself, meaning they cannot serve as a company director, for a specific duration of between two and 15 years. This option may be offered by the Insolvency Service as an alternative to a court case. |
|
Dissolution (or Striking Off) |
This is the formal process to remove a company from the register at Companies House. Once complete, the company no longer exists. If your company has an outstanding BBL, attempting to dissolve it without informing the lender is a serious breach that generally leads to an investigation. |
|
Fiduciary Duty |
A director's fundamental legal and ethical obligation is to act in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders. Misusing a BBL is a breach of this fiduciary duty. |
|
Fraudulent Trading |
A serious criminal offence which occurs when a director runs a business with the deliberate intention of defrauding its creditors. For example, fabricating documents to obtain a bounce-back loan may be considered fraudulent trading. |
|
Insolvency |
When a company is unable to pay its debts, it is considered insolvent. This may be cash flow insolvent, where the company cannot pay bills that are currently due, or balance sheet insolvent, where the company’s assets are worth less than its liabilities. |
|
Limited Liability |
The legal principle that separates a company director's personal finances from the company's debts. In the case of BBL disputes, misfeasance or fraudulent or wrongful trading by directors can mean that this protection no longer applies, and they become personally liable for the debt. |
|
Misfeasance |
A breach of duty where a director misuses or misapplies company property or funds for their own benefit or for a purpose that does not benefit the company. For example, using funds from a bounce-back loan to cover personal expenses or purchases. |
|
Personal Liability / Compensation Order |
A court order that requires a director to personally contribute their own money to the company's assets, often used in BBL cases to recover funds where they have been proven to have been misused. |
|
Unfit Conduct |
The standard used by the Insolvency Service to determine whether a director should be disqualified. Unfit conduct does not necessarily mean breaking the law; it can also cover negligence, incompetence, and failures in record-keeping. |
|
Winding-Up Petition |
A legal notice filed at court by a creditor who is owed money by a company. It is the first step in seeking a court order compelling the company into compulsory liquidation. A bank can issue a winding-up petition for an unpaid BBL. |
|
Wrongful Trading |
This occurs if a director continues to trade and run up debts when they knew, or should have known, that the company had no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation. If found guilty of wrongful trading, a director can be made personally liable for debts incurred during that period. |
What does UK law say about bounce-back loans?
In the UK, a loan under the Bounce Back Loan scheme is a company debt, not a personal one. However, directors can be held personally liable if they breach their legal duties. This is primarily pursued under the Insolvency Act 1986.
If a company is liquidated, a liquidator (or the Insolvency Service) will investigate the director's conduct. If they find evidence of misfeasance, such as using the loan for personal benefit rather than for the economic benefit of the business, they can ask a court to issue a Compensation Order, requiring the director to personally repay the misused funds.
Need legal advice on a bounce-back loan dispute?
How to respond to a bounce-back loan dispute
If you receive a demand letter from a lender, debt collector, or insolvency practitioner, do not ignore it. How quickly you respond, and how you handle the enquiry, can significantly impact the outcome.
- Don’t panic. It’s important to take the enquiry seriously and respond promptly, but bear in mind that many BBL disputes can be resolved without serious consequences.
- Gather comprehensive records. Collect all BBL-related documents: the application, accounts for the relevant financial years, and bank statements showing exactly how the loan was spent.
- Review “Pay As You Grow”. If the issue is affordability, contact your lender immediately to discuss extending your loan term or taking a payment holiday before you default.
Seek specialist legal advice. Complex Law’s commercial team specialises in director disputes and insolvency matters. We can help you understand your position and formulate the best possible strategy to respond.
Quick Quiz
How much do you know about romance scams?
Quiz: Question 1 of
5
Quiz Complete
You scored X out of
5
A director used a £50,000 BBL to repay their personal mortgage. If the company is liquidated, what is the most likely consequence for that director?
What was the maximum a business could borrow under the Bounce Back Loan Scheme?
A company with a BBL is struck off (dissolved). What can the Insolvency Service do?
If a bank claims on the government guarantee for a BBL, what does this mean for the company director?
Which of the following is NOT a 'Pay As You Grow' (PAYG) option for a struggling business?
Are you concerned about a bounce-back loan dispute?
If you’ve received a letter of demand relating to a bounce-back loan, are facing questions from an insolvency practitioner, or have any other concerns about bounce-back loans related to your business, speak to one of the team at Complex Law to get qualified, expert advice about the best way forward.
This page is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, please contact our team directly.

